HK
Heykuki News
Top
New
Best
Ask
Show
Jobs
Toggle theme
Top
New
Best
Ask
Show
Jobs
Request
331.
▲
How can a top scientist be so confidently wrong? (R.A. Fisher smoking example)
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
1 comment
4 years ago
LittlePeter
2 points
332.
▲
Buying things vs. buying experiences (vs. buying nothing at all)
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
1 comment
4 years ago
Tomte
2 points
333.
▲
Nudgelords: Given their past track record, why should I trust them this time?
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
1 comment
4 years ago
leonry
2 points
334.
▲
The view that the scientific process is “red tape”
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
1 comment
6 years ago
todsacerdoti
2 points
335.
▲
Who are you gonna believe, me or your lying eyes?
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
1 comment
6 years ago
luu
2 points
336.
▲
Please socially distance me from this regression model
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
1 comment
6 years ago
eternalban
2 points
337.
▲
What’s wrong with null hypothesis significance testing
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
1 comment
7 years ago
codesuki
2 points
338.
▲
Mind-Body Healing: An Exchange
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
2 days ago
u1hcw9nx
2 points
339.
▲
Blogging and Writing Style
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
2 months ago
Tomte
2 points
340.
▲
Fraud and the false optimism of AI for science
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
2 months ago
ivansavz
2 points
341.
▲
The Internet of Poop
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
2 months ago
jruohonen
2 points
342.
▲
Probabilistic feature analysis of facial perception of emotions [pdf]
sites.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
3 months ago
luu
2 points
343.
▲
The 80% Power Lie
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
4 months ago
Tomte
2 points
344.
▲
OK, I reread that classic paper by Paul Meehl, and
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
5 months ago
Tomte
2 points
345.
▲
How much of "Mississippi's education miracle" is an artifact of selection bias?
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
7 months ago
Anon84
2 points
346.
▲
Reasons to Use Bayesian Inference
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
8 months ago
nextos
2 points
347.
▲
Howl, after Allen Ginsberg (for the AI-headed hipsters)
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
9 months ago
paulpauper
2 points
348.
▲
Bring on the Stupid: When does it make sense to judge a something by its worst?
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
a year ago
nabla9
2 points
349.
▲
Proving a Null Hypothesis?
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
a year ago
nabla9
2 points
350.
▲
I no longer use the term "cargo-cult science"
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
a year ago
Tomte
2 points
351.
▲
Re: "AI Needs Specialization to Generalize"
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
a year ago
danso
2 points
352.
▲
The piranha principle: What does it mean, exactly?
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
a year ago
Tomte
2 points
353.
▲
You can learn a lot from a simple simulation (example of experimental design)
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
a year ago
Tomte
2 points
354.
▲
7 steps to junk science that can achieve worldly success
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
a year ago
luu
2 points
355.
▲
When do stories seem real?
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
a year ago
Tomte
2 points
356.
▲
Most Popular Posts of 2024
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
a year ago
Tomte
2 points
357.
▲
Harvard time baby: completely botched data but you don't change your conclusions
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
2 years ago
nabla9
2 points
358.
▲
What it takes to conclude that a research seam has been mined to exhaustion
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
2 years ago
domofutu
2 points
359.
▲
Statisticians: When We Teach, We Don't Practice What We Preach (2012) [pdf]
stat.columbia.edu
discuss
2 years ago
Tomte
2 points
360.
▲
Andrew Gelman is not the science police because there is no science police
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
2 years ago
Tomte
2 points
More