HK
Heykuki News
Top
New
Best
Ask
Show
Jobs
Toggle theme
Top
New
Best
Ask
Show
Jobs
Request
361.
▲
Statistical Experiments and Science Experiments
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
4 years ago
Tomte
2 points
362.
▲
Bayes: Radical, Liberal, or Conservative? (2007)
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
4 years ago
Tomte
2 points
363.
▲
The Discount Cost Paradox?
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
4 years ago
luu
2 points
364.
▲
How can something be clear and unambiguous and still take decades to resolve
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
4 years ago
k0stas
2 points
365.
▲
Hey It’s Time for Another Greatest Seminar Speaker
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
4 years ago
Tomte
2 points
366.
▲
From 0 to 100K in 10 years: nurturing open-source community [pdf]
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
4 years ago
luu
2 points
367.
▲
(Now that faculty aren’t coming into the office) Will universities recover?
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
4 years ago
jeffreyrogers
2 points
368.
▲
Bayesian inference for discrete parameters and for continuous parameters
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
4 years ago
luu
2 points
369.
▲
This Time, don’t blame the news media
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
4 years ago
Tomte
2 points
370.
▲
Junk science and unavailable data at the European Heart Journal
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
4 years ago
Tomte
2 points
371.
▲
Which User?
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
4 years ago
Tomte
2 points
372.
▲
I don’t think this study on discriminatory attitudes is useful
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
4 years ago
Tomte
2 points
373.
▲
Is there any heuristic we might use to identify wholly inappropriate stats
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
4 years ago
Tomte
2 points
374.
▲
Krueger Uber $100k Update
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
4 years ago
blopeur
2 points
375.
▲
“Unsupervised learning” gets a bad rap
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
4 years ago
RafelMri
2 points
376.
▲
Historical journal records reveal a surge of methodological distortions
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
4 years ago
nojito
2 points
377.
▲
I was looking through the wrong end of the telescope
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
4 years ago
Tomte
2 points
378.
▲
“Would Democratic Socialism Be Better?”
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
4 years ago
Tomte
2 points
379.
▲
The problem with (some) science: How much is it a problem with process?
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
4 years ago
Tomte
2 points
380.
▲
How do things work at top econ journals, exactly?
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
4 years ago
luu
2 points
381.
▲
A Bayesian framework for interpreting findings from impact evaluations
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
4 years ago
Tomte
2 points
382.
▲
How to Get Confident with Statistics
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
4 years ago
RafelMri
2 points
383.
▲
People whose job it is to do just one thing aren’t always good at that one thing
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
4 years ago
syntaxfree
2 points
384.
▲
SBC: A new R package for simulation-based calibration of Bayesian models
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
4 years ago
luu
2 points
385.
▲
Forking Paths and Gerrymandering
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
4 years ago
hn-0001
2 points
386.
▲
How things work at top econ journals: Gelman
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
4 years ago
srvmshr
2 points
387.
▲
Problems with a meta-analysis of “nudging” in PNAS
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
4 years ago
HuShifang
2 points
388.
▲
Objectively Worse but Practically Better
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
5 years ago
dxbydt
2 points
389.
▲
Controversy re: “Facial recognition technology can expose political orientation“
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
5 years ago
danso
2 points
390.
▲
Thoughts on “ASA on Statistical Significance and Replicability”
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
5 years ago
nabla9
2 points
More