Search: statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu | Heykuki News

HK

Heykuki News

Top New Best Ask Show Jobs

Top New Best Ask Show Jobs

31.

Why We Sleep: A Tale of Institutional Failure

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

6 years ago

139 points

32.

Which one of these will be the biggest “unicorn” failure ever?

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

4 years ago

136 points

33.

What’s Wrong with Bayes

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

7 years ago

131 points

34.

Bad stuff going down at the American Sociological Association

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

2 years ago

129 points

35.

I disagree with Turing and Kahneman regarding statistical evidence (2014)

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

4 years ago

129 points

36.

I Got More Data, My Model Is More Refined, but My Estimator Is Getting Worse [pdf]

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

7 years ago

129 points

37.

Those correction notices, in full

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

2 years ago

128 points

38.

An election forecast that’s 50-50 is not “giving up”

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

a year ago

124 points

39.

Dean of Engineering at University of Nevada wrote a paper that’s bad

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

2 years ago

123 points

40.

Deterministic thinking: a problem in how we think, not just in how we act

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

7 years ago

122 points

41.

EU proposing to regulate the use of Bayesian estimation

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

5 years ago

119 points

42.

A successful example of "adversarial collaboration"

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

3 years ago

118 points

43.

Dumb statistical models, always making people look bad

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

a year ago

118 points

44.

Defining Statistical Models in Jax?

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

2 years ago

118 points

45.

How to Think about Correlation?

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

6 years ago

110 points

46.

Holes in Bayesian Statistics

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

6 years ago

107 points

47.

Bayesian statistics and machine learning: How do they differ?

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

3 years ago

105 points

48.

The examples in the textbooks are not representative of real world problems

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

4 years ago

101 points

49.

Update on the fake story about the river laborers paying people to whip them

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

4 years ago

101 points

50.

“Is there a heuristic we might use to identify and flag questionable papers?”

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

4 years ago

99 points

51.

An accidental experiment that saved 700 lives

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

4 years ago

96 points

52.

Critique of Freakonomics interview with psychologist Ellen Langer

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

2 years ago

94 points

53.

Fields where it matters, fields where you can thrive on BS alone, and in between

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

3 years ago

93 points

54.

“A Headline That Will Make Global-Warming Activists Apoplectic”

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

5 years ago

91 points

55.

A review of the effects of installing air filters in classrooms

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

6 years ago

90 points

56.

Not Frequentist Enough

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

4 years ago

89 points

57.

Feeling like a pariah, even when you’re not

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

5 years ago

80 points

58.

Refuted papers continue to be cited more than their failed replications

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

2 years ago

79 points

59.

Did blind orchestra auditions benefit women?

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

7 years ago

78 points

60.

Only positive reinforcement for researchers in some fields

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

4 years ago

77 points