HK
Heykuki News
Top
New
Best
Ask
Show
Jobs
Toggle theme
Top
New
Best
Ask
Show
Jobs
Request
181.
▲
A Suggestion for Freakonomics and Sean Carroll
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
10 months ago
gjf
5 points
182.
▲
About that bogus claim that "chess grandmasters" burn 6000 calories per day
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
a year ago
Tomte
5 points
183.
▲
Skepticism about the science establishment, then and now
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
a year ago
luu
5 points
184.
▲
"Does anyone expect meaningful insight to come from a study like this?"
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
a year ago
nabla9
5 points
185.
▲
A 10% swing in win probability corresponds to a 0.4% swing in predicted vote
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
2 years ago
Tomte
5 points
186.
▲
Which books, papers, and blogs are in the Bayesian canon?
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
2 years ago
banjo_milkman
5 points
187.
▲
Why isn't Barack Obama out there giving political speeches?
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
2 years ago
Tomte
5 points
188.
▲
Bayesian Data Analysis 3rd Ed [pdf]
stat.columbia.edu
discuss
3 years ago
Anon84
5 points
189.
▲
Plotting y(t) vs. y'(t), tracing over time with a dot for each year
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
4 years ago
leonry
5 points
190.
▲
CDC as bad as Harvard? – – – no, but they could still do better
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
5 years ago
temp8964
5 points
191.
▲
Did that “bottomless soup bowl” experiment ever happen?
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
5 years ago
cribbles
5 points
192.
▲
Credentialism, elite employment, and career aspirations
stat.columbia.edu
discuss
15 years ago
cwan
5 points
193.
▲
Bayes: Radical, Liberal, or Conservative?
stat.columbia.edu
discuss
15 years ago
dschoon
5 points
194.
▲
The fractal nature of scientific revolutions (2005)
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
1 comment
a year ago
Tomte
4 points
195.
▲
Gambling provides a rocking of the emotions to put you in a babylike state
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
6 days ago
SVI
4 points
196.
▲
Why are there squares everywhere in statistics?
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
a month ago
Tomte
4 points
197.
▲
How to report a N=12 study?
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
2 months ago
caminanteblanco
4 points
198.
▲
The Paradox of Derivatives and Integrals
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
3 months ago
saeedesmaili
4 points
199.
▲
Who has the lowest Erdos-Bacon-Epstein number?
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
5 months ago
varjag
4 points
200.
▲
ML research is not serious research, NeurIPS board statement suggests
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
5 months ago
u1hcw9nx
4 points
201.
▲
"Belief in the law of small numbers" the continuing appeal of junk science
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
7 months ago
nabla9
4 points
202.
▲
It's a Jax, Jax, Jax, Jax World
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
9 months ago
thebeardisred
4 points
203.
▲
"Causal" is like "error term"
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
9 months ago
neehao
4 points
204.
▲
Ecologists' endless quest for automatic inference
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
a year ago
williamjsdavis
4 points
205.
▲
What Happened to Genetic Algorithms?
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
a year ago
Areibman
4 points
206.
▲
An election forecast that's 50-50 is not "giving up."
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
a year ago
Tomte
4 points
207.
▲
Softmax is on the log, not the logit scale
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
a year ago
Tomte
4 points
208.
▲
Physics is like Brazil, Statistics is like Chile
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
2 years ago
Tomte
4 points
209.
▲
Levels of fraud: One-time, Linear, and Exponential
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
2 years ago
Tomte
4 points
210.
▲
You can guarantee that the term "statistical guarantee" will irritate me
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
discuss
2 years ago
Tomte
4 points
More