HK
Heykuki News
Top
New
Best
Ask
Show
Jobs
Toggle theme
Top
New
Best
Ask
Show
Jobs
Request
1.
▲
The EARN IT act is back, and it’s more dangerous than ever
cyberlaw.stanford.edu
482 comments
4 years ago
grappler
1363 points
2.
▲
An even worse anti-encryption bill than EARN IT
cyberlaw.stanford.edu
351 comments
6 years ago
abecedarius
903 points
3.
▲
The EARN IT Act: how to ban end-to-end encryption without banning it
cyberlaw.stanford.edu
234 comments
6 years ago
liotier
613 points
4.
▲
DOJ plans to strike against encryption while the Techlash iron is hot
cyberlaw.stanford.edu
331 comments
6 years ago
erwan
444 points
5.
▲
The FCC needs to stop 5G fast lanes
cyberlaw.stanford.edu
320 comments
2 years ago
rsingel
433 points
6.
▲
I have a lot to say about Signal’s Cellebrite hack
cyberlaw.stanford.edu
298 comments
5 years ago
curmudgeon22
367 points
7.
▲
Megaupload: A Lot Less Guilty Than You Think
cyberlaw.stanford.edu
115 comments
14 years ago
privacyguru
352 points
8.
▲
How AI destroys institutions
cyberlaw.stanford.edu
281 comments
5 months ago
JeanKage
305 points
9.
▲
EU member states still cannot agree about end-to-end encryption
cyberlaw.stanford.edu
147 comments
3 years ago
andrew-ld
119 points
10.
▲
The end of Roe will bring about a sea change in the encryption debate
cyberlaw.stanford.edu
232 comments
4 years ago
zacwest
113 points
11.
▲
California’s AV testing rules apply to Tesla’s “FSD”
cyberlaw.stanford.edu
148 comments
5 years ago
codechicago277
105 points
12.
▲
EU Regulator: Proposal to force websites to pay telcos puts Internet at risk
cyberlaw.stanford.edu
40 comments
4 years ago
jacobobryant
103 points
13.
▲
The Big Interception Flaw in the US-UK Cloud Act Agreement
cyberlaw.stanford.edu
6 comments
7 years ago
robteix
98 points
14.
▲
T-Mobile’s Binge on Violates Key Net Neutrality Principles [pdf]
cyberlaw.stanford.edu
100 comments
10 years ago
sinak
96 points
15.
▲
Towards Learning From Losing Aaron Swartz: Part 2
cyberlaw.stanford.edu
15 comments
13 years ago
tptacek
90 points
16.
▲
Who's Submitting AI-Tainted Filings in Court?
cyberlaw.stanford.edu
60 comments
8 months ago
cratermoon
83 points
17.
▲
Algorithm and Blues: The Tyranny of the Coming Smart-Tech Utopia
cyberlaw.stanford.edu
44 comments
8 years ago
raleighm
77 points
18.
▲
The Daily Stormer, Online Speech, and Internet Registrars
cyberlaw.stanford.edu
226 comments
9 years ago
walterbell
76 points
19.
▲
Epic Marketplace caught stealing history by Stanford Security Lab
cyberlaw.stanford.edu
13 comments
15 years ago
mikeleeorg
66 points
20.
▲
Comment on the UK Gov Proposal to Ban “Bespoke” “Sophisticated” Encrypted Phones
cyberlaw.stanford.edu
28 comments
3 years ago
dane-pgp
39 points
21.
▲
Stanford never promised not to use Google money for privacy research
cyberlaw.stanford.edu
14 comments
12 years ago
doctorshady
34 points
22.
▲
The EARN IT Act: How to Ban End-to-End Encryption Without Banning It
cyberlaw.stanford.edu
9 comments
6 years ago
erwan
32 points
23.
▲
Israeli Court Enforces for the First Time a Creative Commons License
cyberlaw.stanford.edu
1 comment
15 years ago
zoowar
31 points
24.
▲
Jennifer Granick: Towards Learning From Losing Aaron Swartz
cyberlaw.stanford.edu
1 comment
13 years ago
tptacek
18 points
25.
▲
Tracking the Trackers: Where Everybody Knows Your Username
cyberlaw.stanford.edu
discuss
15 years ago
mwexler
7 points
26.
▲
Barbara van Schewick's initial analysis of the FCC's 2024 open internet order
cyberlaw.stanford.edu
discuss
2 years ago
leotravis10
6 points
27.
▲
CollabMark project launch to hack trademarks for open source
cyberlaw.stanford.edu
discuss
12 years ago
freeasinspeech
5 points
28.
▲
Stanford Security Lab is crowdsourcing a study of the NSA phone metadata program
cyberlaw.stanford.edu
discuss
13 years ago
jonathanmayer
5 points
29.
▲
Federal shutdown deals blow to hobbled cybersecurity agency
cyberlaw.stanford.edu
1 comment
8 months ago
sans_souse
4 points
30.
▲
Banning Strong Encryption Does Not Mean Catching Criminals
cyberlaw.stanford.edu
discuss
7 years ago
DyslexicAtheist
4 points
More