Yes, that's exactly my point -- that in fact reaching this point has been a six-month effort.
I didn't post on HN myself, and therefore did not choose the title either.
Anyways, thanks for pointing that out and I'm glad you got something out of the article!
If it's helpful or somehow relevant since you brought up Twitter followers, I started with about 9K when I launched the newsletter.
Wrote about that process here, though maybe you've seen it already? https://bloggingfordevs.com/launch-a-newsletter/
I brought up your Twitter followers because it seemed relevant to your accomplishments in this post, given that they were directly responsible for ~1/4 of your email list and likely indirectly responsible for many more subscribers (Signal boosting your PH launch, for example).
Having an audience seems to be the most important thing for a lot of product launches, so I'm always curious about how people built their audience.
I also don't see it as competition. People will join if they think it's valuable, they'll leave if they don't. You can also be part of multiple communities if you think it's worth it.
I'm glad you got some ideas from the post about making your community more sustainable. Wishing you the best with that!
No worries if you're not into it, just curious what felt "infomercially" to you. Is it that the email form is kind of immediate? I changed that recently before launching on product hunt -- it used to just be a paragraph and two input fields.
Thanks for checking it out in any case :)
Writing like that is bait, because it will generate money from marks without even verifying whether the claim is true. If I take the bait, then I'm a sucker, and I'd rather keep my money and not be a sucker. To turn phrases in that way is sensationalism, and while I'm sure it works for you, I believe it trades short term cash for long term trust. When the next sucker finds that he can't reproduce your results, there's a good chance he'll feel shafted.
Yeah, I know what you mean. I'm trying this "build in public" thing which is more transparent than feels natural to most people.
Who knows where it'll go, but I think it's cool and useful to see people's "early work", not only a final polished result.
So, trying to contribute some of that stuff myself!
That said, I'm not sure where I wrote I want to reach 20K? I don't foresee reaching that in terms of either revenue or subscribers in the near future.
Thanks for reading, even if you aren't sure about it. Was there a part you think was redundant or it was just a bit long-winded?
The results so far are pretty cool and, in my opinion, should be a signal that it is TOTALLY possible for individuals writing great technical content to stand out for a specific technology.