lysace
Born on July 23, 2024•1765 Karma
"This is Army Commander Tomás Miguel Ribeiro Paiva. We have chosen to take command of the country to protect you against serious crimes against the people that we have become aware of. Remain calm and continue with your daily duties."
(Except in Brazilian Portuguese.)
I guess so scary that there isn't a single person willing to try it. But yeah, that is the most dangerous one possible.
There is so little public information on them, yet they intuitively make so much sense, given how much was expended on other related aspects. And sometimes you do get hints that they do, in fact exist. (My perspective is from Sweden.)
I guess I'm saying that I'm impressed with their operational security.
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/historical-cost-of-comput...
It’s slower but you can run them.
You should check out Turbo Rascal (...), but you probably already did.
https://lemonspawn.com/turbo-rascal-syntax-error-expected-bu... (outdated cert)
Extremely poor taste.
BTW Oberon was / is not just a language, but a whole very interesting interactive computing environment.
How so?
Given the existence of both groups I think just the claim that it’s offensive, without explaining why, is ambiguous and just reacting defensively doesn’t address that.
The USSR eradicated everyone with a deviating opinion about the regime. They perished in the dungeons of the KGB and in the Gulags. What remained were opportunists and followers. Opinions!
This whole diversion is off topic and can be seen as a form of bad faith.
This is a false equivalence between those who suffered from USSR and those who are ignorant of the suffering of others. I don't think we should care about feelings of a group who are for whatever reason nostalgic about a genocidal oppressive regime.
Peoples’ feelings about the nations they are born into and told to love from birth are complex and multifaceted. The people I know who grew up in the USSR have both good and bad things to say about it, just like the people I know who grew up in the USA (like me) at the same time (the 1970s-1990s) have both good and bad things to say about it. And that isn’t just about our own experiences growing up in these respective nations, but about learning our birth nations’ true histories, and how closely (or not) the ideals espoused by their founders and politicians and important figures in their histories were reflected in their actions.
Thus I really, truly do believe it’s ambiguous for someone to say, without any further context, that they find an image of a legislature with some screen shots of an IDE placed into it offensive. Is it offensive because it’s referencing a body they consider evil or is it offensive because it’s trivializing a body they consider good? Without context it’s impossible to know, and acting like everyone shares the same context about this is just refusal to engage with the world as it is rather than the world as you’d like it to be.
No. The right analogy is an image of the Reichstag with Nazi banners.
https://geopoliticaleconomy.com/2026/06/07/study-world-usa-b...
A lot of people might also have coherent reasons to think that analogy applies equally to the US House of Representatives and the US Senate.
If you think that dumb nostalgia about “good old times” and complete ignorance/acceptance of any murders if they are considered state-sanctioned is somehow different in your own country (any country at any time), you must come to conclusion that some people inherently have lesser “quality” than others based on papers that they are given at birth by this or that organisation calling itself a state. Problematic, as they say.
That alone makes it very bad taste to use any of the Soviet imagery. I'm not sure why it's even a debatable topic at this point.
[0] https://www.pcgamer.com/games/gog-apologizes-for-emailing-na...
Honestly your attitude towards this is why the internet is so bloody toxic all the time now and simply not fun.
I haven't given attitude beyond providing a link to a story, when someone else said they hadn't heard anything.
Oh, I see what you did there.