oreoftw
Born on September 30, 2013•43 Karma
Things are uncertain(were they ever certain?), every day there is another armageddon prophecy screaming at you from social media and newspapers.
So one can try to hedge, squeeze more out of oneself to make sure he did all he could.
Or even simpler, Roaring Bitmaps: https://pncnmnp.github.io/blogs/roaring-bitmaps.html
Only invoking GDPR and the ownership of a domain name allowed me to regain access and restore email service. Without GDPR I would've got nothing at all.
1: I just noticed that Takeout now offers a scheduled export option, including cloud-to-cloud transfers, so I am definitely going to turn that on
This has magically unbanned me in less than two days. In contrast to two months of tweeting, emailing support, nagging my google eng friends and even support folks via linkedin.
I don't know how stringent the geo check for claims is, but as soon as you become an EEA resident you can invoke GDPR.
I would recommend to ask Google’s DPO anyway.
But at the same time it doesn’t have to be that bad. I don’t have this array of issues because I do: - query whitelisting for performance and security, - data loading to avoid n+1, authentication with whatever works(session cookies, tokens), - permission check based on the auth context in a resolver.
It works decently for us, allowing to stay away from getting into ESB. Yet have some shared domain, type safety, and easy integration of legacy and new systems/services.
I would say a bigger issue for us was to keep it all nicely organized / designed in terms of types and api contracts. But that’s manageable.
All people want is to live in a quiet and a nice place after all.
Why someone who doesn’t even live there but has a bigger buck should decide?
Honestly, this is sane zoning. The Japanese model is very effective. They saw roughly 0% growth in housing prices from 1990 to present. Housing in downtown Tokyo is affordable. You'll be hard pressed to find someone who thinks Tokyo is an abomination, it's a top-10 world city is basically every ranking.
> All people want is to live in a quiet and a nice place after all.
Some of them! Not all of them. Some of them want a place to live within an hour of work, and for them that's more important.
For those that want that they can (a) buy the land around them necessary to make that happen (b) lobby the city around them to buy the land necessary to make that happen (a 'park') or (c) move somewhere like-minded people live.
> Why someone who doesn’t even live there but has a bigger buck should decide?
Why should the person who got there first decide what other people get to do? That's not even democracy, that's just gerontocracy.
If the density becomes problematic, buy the land, or mosey on.
This to me is the least compelling counter-argument. "Nobody wants to live in a big dense city" is like saying "nobody drives in New York, there's too much traffic!" You personally don't, but obviously, we can tell by inspection that's simply not a true statement in general.
Which brings us back to "but I got here first!" which is to me, the second-least compelling argument.
If you don't own a car, you don't determine when to wash it.
If you don't own a property, you totally still get to determine what to do with it by being a whiny neighbor. Why is this OK?
I'm very-much onboard with the "put up or shut up" model of zoning. If you want the place to be empty, you should own it and keep it empty.
People want all sorts of things. Walkability, transit, cafes, restaurants, recreation, jobs. Some do prefer the particular brand of quiet offered by the suburban form, but because it's the only thing you're allowed to build, lots of us who do not want it are forced into it.
Existence of this software is the core reason, me and my team to look at alternatives for Mac OS and finally after CSAM fiasco, to switch 90 percent of our workflow to Linux. We still use some Apple computers, but we isolated them from the network.
There is nothing false in knowing what is going on with my computer. I suggest reading this paper for more clarification. https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~rdriley/487/papers/Thompson_1984_Ref...